Perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and senior officials in notorious government regimes, can be deported from Canada. This study reports on the first complete and systematic empirical analysis of all finalized international criminality deportation cases in Canada. The analysis, a review of deportation cases finalized between January 2018 and July 2020, shows that Canada is using deportation law in place of, and instead of, refugee exclusion law. This means that scholars interested in Canadian refugee exclusion should play close attention to deportation law. This study also found that international criminality allegations were usually made against people for their involvement in problematic police, prison, or military institutions. Most international criminality deportation investigations were minimal and revolved almost entirely around a person’s self-disclosures. This article concludes with a discussion about how deportation law and process makes international criminal law unique in the deportation context.

中文翻译：

---

新的加拿大难民排除法：国际刑法驱逐令的实证分析，2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月

战争罪和危害人类罪的肇事者，以及臭名昭著的政府政权的高级官员，可以被驱逐出加拿大。本研究报告了对加拿大所有已定案的国际犯罪驱逐案件的首次完整和系统的实证分析。该分析是对 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月期间完成的递解出境案件的审查，表明加拿大正在使用递解出境法代替难民排斥法。这意味着对加拿大难民排斥感兴趣的学者应该密切关注驱逐出境法。这项研究还发现，国际犯罪指控通常是针对那些参与有问题的警察、监狱或军事机构的人。大多数国际犯罪驱逐调查的规模很小，几乎完全围绕一个人的自我披露展开。本文最后讨论了驱逐出境的法律和程序如何使国际刑法在驱逐背景下独一无二。