In the study of child-to-parent violence (CPV), the perspective of the victimized aggressor has not been analyzed in depth, and the impact of different contexts of victimization even less so. The aim of this study was to examine the unique and additive effects of family victimization (direct and vicarious) and school victimization (bullying and cyberbullying) on predicting CPV toward fathers and mothers. The sample included 3,142 adolescents aged 12-18 years (M age = 14.32) from schools in southern Spain. The participants completed the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire adolescent version, the Violence Exposure Scale, and the European Bullying/Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaires. The findings showed that independently, both family and school victimization predicted CPV, with direct family victimization being the best predictor, and that jointly, contributed to a significant improvement in prediction, explaining approximately 20% of CPV. Furthermore, a correspondence was found between the type of violence experienced and the type of violence perpetrated. It is necessary to study the profile of the victimized aggressor in CPV in order to design interventions adapted to the specific needs of this profile.

中文翻译：

---

家庭和学校受害对儿童对父母的暴力的独特和附加影响。

在儿童对父母的暴力（CPV）的研究中，受害施暴者的视角并未得到深入分析，不同受害情境的影响更是如此。本研究的目的是检验家庭受害（直接和替代）和学校受害（欺凌和网络欺凌）对预测对父亲和母亲的 CPV 的独特和相加效应。样本包括来自西班牙南部学校的 3,142 名 12-18 岁（M 年龄 = 14.32）的青少年。参与者完成了儿童对父母的暴力问卷青少年版、暴力暴露量表和欧洲欺凌/网络欺凌干预项目问卷。研究结果表明，家庭和学校受害独立地预测 CPV，直接家庭受害是最好的预测因子，这共同促成了预测的显着改善，解释了大约 20% 的 CPV。此外，还发现所经历的暴力类型与实施的暴力类型之间存在对应关系。有必要研究 CPV 中受害攻击者的概况，以便设计适合该概况特定需求的干预措施。