Shortly after the appearance of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant’s claim that the ontological proof of God’s existence contains all the probative force of the cosmological argument was discussed at great length by J. F. Flatt, J. F. v. Abel and J. A. Eberhard. These early criticisms do not seem to have received the attention they deserve, even though they are extremely relevant, cogent, and difficult to dispute. Regardless of whether their assumptions are accepted, these objections point out certain obscurities and flaws in Kant’s argument, casting doubt, from a logical standpoint, on the success of the main Kantian criticism of the cosmological proof.

中文翻译：

---

上帝存在的本体论证明真的包含了宇宙论论证的所有证明力吗？弗拉特、阿贝尔和埃伯哈德对康德命题的早期批评

出现后不久纯粹理性批判，康德声称上帝存在的本体论证明包含宇宙论论证的所有证明力，JF Flatt, JF v. 亚伯和 JA 埃伯哈德。这些早期的批评似乎没有得到应有的关注，尽管它们非常相关、令人信服且难以争议。不管他们的假设是否被接受，这些反对意见都指出了康德论证中的某些晦涩和缺陷，从逻辑的角度来看，对康德对宇宙学证明的主要批评是否成功表示怀疑。