During the COVID-19 pandemic, the normal use of European conflict rules determining the applicable social security legislation was temporarily suspended to avoid changes in the applicable legislation as a result of telework, which was being obliged or recommended. The purpose was to avoid the consequences of such a change. However, these forms of remote work are expected to remain in existence after the pandemic, even when the suspension of the conflict rules is no longer in place. So, the question arises whether the suspension of the strict application of the conflict rules should be prolonged after the pandemic, or whether these conflict rules should be applied differently or even amended. First, this article discusses the measures that were taken during the pandemic. Next, it will highlight the consequences if the temporary measures are not prolonged after the pandemic for the determination of the applicable social security legislation. It will explore the possible re-interpretation of or even amendments to these rules in order to adapt them to the continuation of telework.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间，暂时中止了确定适用社会保障立法的欧洲冲突规则的正常使用，以避免由于强制或建议远程工作而导致适用立法发生变化。目的是避免这种变化的后果。但是，即使不再暂停冲突规则，这些形式的远程工作预计在大流行之后仍将存在。那么问题来了，在疫情过后，是否应该延长严格适用冲突规则的暂停时间，或者这些冲突规则是否应该区别适用甚至修改。首先，本文讨论了大流行期间采取的措施。下一个，它将强调如果在大流行之后不延长临时措施以确定适用的社会保障立法的后果。它将探讨对这些规则进行重新解释甚至修改的可能性，以使其适应远程办公的继续。