Recently municipal courts have found that foreign states do not enjoy jurisdictional immunity with respect to civil claims involving serious violations of international law within the forum state’s territory during armed conflict. This article assesses the recent judgments’ potential impact, taking into account previous court practice and international human rights jurisprudence. It concludes that an exception to immunity in the above circumstances where no alternative judicial remedies exist for the victims has a basis in previous practice and may be required to give effect to international human rights obligations. A recognition by the foreign state of an individual victims’ right to bring a claim before that state’s courts could provide the victims with reparation in the form of satisfaction. Where no such possibility exists, a limited exception to the rule of state immunity would ensure the victims’ right to access to court and to the truth.

中文翻译：

---

国家豁免和受害者诉诸法庭、获得赔偿和了解真相的权利

最近，市政法院裁定，对于涉及武装冲突期间在法院地国领土内严重违反国际法的民事索赔，外国不享有管辖豁免。本文评估了近期判决的潜在影响，同时考虑了以往的法院实践和国际人权判例。它的结论是，在受害者没有替代司法补救办法的上述情况下豁免豁免有以往实践的基础，可能需要履行国际人权义务。外国承认个别受害人有权向该国法院提出索赔，可以为受害人提供满足形式的赔偿。如果不存在这种可能性，