当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of Forensic Mental Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A follow-up of the PFS-AV, an assessment instrument for hostility
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health ( IF 0.922 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-14 , DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2022.2098423
Ruud H. J. Hornsveld 1 , Floris W. Kraaimaat 2
Affiliation  

Abstract

This follow-up study presents psychometric data and norms of the Adapted Version of the Picture-Frustration Study (PFS-AV) from 422 male violent forensic psychiatric in- and outpatients, 101 male violent long-term prisoners, and 319 secondary vocational students (160 males and 159 females). The PFS-AV is a production instrument to measure hostility with 12 items. A diagnostician scored the responses on a seven-point scale, running from not at all hostile (0) to extremely hostile (7). Support was found for the PFS-AV construct, concurrent, and discriminant validity in all three samples. Therefore, the present results underline the generalizability and applicability of the PFS-AV in different populations. Furthermore, for clinical diagnosis, norms are presented for the three samples, just as examples for the scoring on the Likert scale. Also, Dutch, English, and German versions of the PFS-AV with scoring instructions are available.



中文翻译:

PFS-AV 的后续行动,敌意评估工具

摘要

这项后续研究提供了来自 422 名男性暴力法医精神病住院和门诊病人、101 名男性暴力长期囚犯和 319 名中职学生的心理测量数据和图片挫折研究改编版 (PFS-AV) 的规范( 160 名男性和 159 名女性)。PFS-AV 是一种测量敌意的生产工具,有 12 个项目。一位诊断师以七分制对回答进行评分,从完全没有敌意(0) 到极度敌对(7). 在所有三个样本中都发现了对 PFS-AV 构造、并行和区分有效性的支持。因此,目前的结果强调了 PFS-AV 在不同人群中的普遍性和适用性。此外,对于临床诊断,提供了三个样本的规范,就像李克特量表上的评分示例一样。此外,还提供带有评分说明的荷兰语、英语和德语版本的 PFS-AV。

更新日期:2022-07-14
down
wechat
bug