Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers,Research Integrity and Peer Review

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Research Integrity and Peer Review › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Research Integrity and Peer Review Pub Date : 2022-07-13 , DOI: 10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y
Danielle B Rice _{1,

2} , Ba' Pham ₃ , Justin Presseau _{4,

5,

6} , Andrea C Tricco _{7,

8,

9} , David Moher _{1,

4,

5}

Affiliation

Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Knowledge Translation Program, Unity Health Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Epidemiology Division and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Correction to: Res Integr Peer Rev 7, 1 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the ‘Results’, both in the Abstract and in the main text: it incorrectly stated that ‘a greater proportion of mega peer reviews were male (92%) as compared to the control reviewers (70% male)’, instead of 74% vs 58% as listed in the table.

In addition, ‘Web of Science’ needed to be changed to ‘Clarivate’ in the main text and the ‘Acknowledgements’ section.

The original article [1] has been corrected.

Rice, et al. Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022;7:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Authors and Affiliations

Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
Danielle B. Rice & David Moher
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Danielle B. Rice
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Ba’ Pham
Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
Justin Presseau & David Moher
Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Justin Presseau & David Moher
Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Justin Presseau
Knowledge Translation Program, Unity Health Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Andrea C. Tricco
Epidemiology Division and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Andrea C. Tricco
Queen’s Collaboration for Health Care Quality Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
Andrea C. Tricco

Authors

Danielle B. RiceView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ba’ PhamView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Justin PresseauView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andrea C. TriccoView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David MoherView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Moher.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

Cite this article

Rice, D.B., Pham, B., Presseau, J. et al. Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers. Res Integr Peer Rev 7, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y

Download citation

Published: 13 July 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

中文翻译：

更正：“大型”同行评审员的特征

更正为：Res Integr Peer Rev 7, 1 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1

在原始文章 [1] 发表后，作者在摘要和正文中发现“结果”中有一个错误：它错误地指出“更大比例的大型同行评审是男性 (92%)与对照审阅者（70% 男性）相比，而不是表中列出的 74% 和 58%。

此外，需要将正文和“致谢”部分中的“Web of Science”更改为“Clarivate”。

原文章[1]已更正。

赖斯等人。“大型”同行评审员的特征。Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022；7:1。https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1。
文章谷歌学术

下载参考资料

作者和附属机构

加拿大渥太华渥太华医院研究所期刊临床流行病学项目中心
丹妮尔 B. 赖斯和大卫莫赫
加拿大蒙特利尔麦吉尔大学理学院心理学系
丹妮尔·B·赖斯
加拿大多伦多大学卫生政策、管理和评估研究所
巴范
加拿大渥太华渥太华医院研究所临床流行病学项目
贾斯汀·普雷索和大卫·莫赫
医学院，流行病学和公共卫生学院，渥太华大学，渥太华，加拿大
贾斯汀·普雷索和大卫·莫赫
社会科学学院，心理学学院，渥太华大学，渥太华，加拿大
贾斯汀·普雷索
加拿大多伦多圣迈克尔医院李嘉诚知识研究所知识翻译项目
安德里亚·C·特里科
加拿大多伦多大学达拉拉纳公共卫生学院流行病学部和卫生政策、管理和评估研究所
安德里亚·C·特里科
女王大学卫生保健质量合作 Joanna Briggs 研究所卓越中心，女王大学，金斯敦，加拿大
安德里亚·C·特里科

作者

Danielle B. Rice查看作者的出版物
您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索此作者
Ba' Pham查看作者的出版物
您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索此作者
Justin Presseau查看作者的出版物
您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索此作者
Andrea C. Tricco查看作者的出版物
您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索此作者
David Moher查看作者的出版物
您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索此作者

通讯作者

与大卫·莫赫的通信。

开放存取本文根据知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可进行许可，该许可允许以任何媒介或格式使用、共享、改编、分发和复制，只要您对原作者和来源给予适当的信任，并提供链接到知识共享许可，并说明是否进行了更改。本文中的图像或其他第三方材料包含在文章的知识共享许可中，除非在材料的信用额度中另有说明。如果文章的知识共享许可中未包含材料，并且您的预期用途不受法律法规的允许或超出允许的用途，则您需要直接从版权所有者那里获得许可。要查看此许可证的副本，请访问 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。

转载和许可