Moral dilemmas are a useful tool to investigate empirically, which parameters of a given situation modulate participants’ moral judgment, and in what way. In an effort to provide moral judgment data from a non-WEIRD culture, we provide the translation and validation of 48 classical moral dilemmas in Persian language. The translated dilemma set was submitted to a validation experiment with N = 82 Iranian participants. The four-factor structure of this dilemma set was confirmed; including Personal Force (Personal, Impersonal), Benefit Recipient (Self, Other), Evitability (Avoidable, Inevitable), and Intentionality (Accidental, Instrumental). When comparing moral judgments of Iranian participants to those of Spanish and Italian participants’ from previous research with the same dilemma set, differences emerged. Iranian participants’ moral judgments were more deontological (i.e., they refrained from harm), than Spanish and Italian participants. Religiosity made participants’ moral judgments more deontological, and also dysphoric mood resulted in a more deontological response style.

中文翻译：

---

波斯语中的四十八个经典道德困境：验证和文化适应研究

道德困境是一种有用的工具，可用于实证调查，给定情况的哪些参数调节参与者的道德判断，以及以何种方式调节。在努力提供来自非诡异的文化，我们提供 48 个波斯语经典道德困境的翻译和验证。翻译后的困境集被提交给 N = 82 名伊朗参与者的验证实验。该困境集的四因素结构得到确认；包括个人力量（个人的，非个人的），受益人（自我，其他），可逃避性（可避免的，不可避免的），以及意向性（偶然的，器乐的）。当将伊朗参与者的道德判断与先前研究中使用相同困境集的西班牙和意大利参与者的道德判断进行比较时，差异出现了。与西班牙和意大利参与者相比，伊朗参与者的道德判断更具道义性（即，他们避免受到伤害）。宗教信仰使参与者的道德判断更具道义论，而烦躁情绪导致更具道义论的反应方式。