This article presents the results of survey-based research which explores if licensed aircraft maintenance engineers working in Norway, Sweden, and Portugal experience regulated “just culture” as procedural justice-infused processes when occurrence reporting in European Union (EU) civil aviation. Drawing on Tylerian procedural justice theory, the study finds that, perceived procedural justice is more strongly associated with legitimacy (perceived as support for rules and authority) than legal anxiety among the maintenance engineers. Country-based results reveal differences in engineers' legal experiences of occurrence reporting with perceived procedural justice strongest in Sweden and legal anxiety most influential in Portugal. The article contributes with a first exploration of “just culture” as a procedural justice-infused legal intervention to improve compliance to regulated occurrence reporting by negating legal anxiety in a European aviation context.

中文翻译：

---

人人享有程序正义？欧洲民航的合法性、公正文化和法律焦虑

本文介绍了基于调查的研究结果，该研究探讨了在挪威、瑞典和葡萄牙工作的持牌飞机维修工程师在欧盟 (EU) 民航事件报告中是否经历了受监管的“公正文化”作为程序正义注入的过程。借鉴泰勒程序正义理论，该研究发现，与维护工程师的法律焦虑相比，感知的程序正义与合法性（被认为是对规则和权威的支持）的相关性更强。基于国家/地区的结果揭示了工程师在事件报告的法律经验方面的差异，其中瑞典的程序正义感最强，而葡萄牙的法律焦虑影响力最大。