This article considers UK government’s proposal to re-introduce an accelerated appeals system for detained asylum seekers through resort to legislation. Previously, a similar system, the ‘Detained Fast Track’, was ruled unlawful largely on the basis that it lacked procedural fairness, a core tenet of the rule of law. This article examines the interplay between the rule of law and international human rights law. It adopts a formal notion of the rule of law to assess its effectiveness in protecting asylum seeker’s rights, as a sub-group of ‘unwanted migrants’. This is applied to a case study of the previous system and legal challenges to it to explore the deficiency of legality of the system and the effectiveness of judicial review. Three stages of the previous system are examined, its inception, its survival of early legal challenges and its eventual demise to expose the marginalisation of international human rights safeguards.

中文翻译：

---

英国脱欧后的边境庇护

本文考虑了英国政府通过立法重新引入针对被拘留的寻求庇护者的加速上诉系统的提议。此前，类似的制度“被拘留者快速通道”被裁定为非法，主要是因为它缺乏程序公正性，而这是法治的核心原则。本文探讨了法治与国际人权法之间的相互作用。它采用正式的法治概念来评估其在保护寻求庇护者作为“不受欢迎的移民”的一个子群体的权利方面的有效性。将此应用于以往制度的案例研究及其法律挑战，探讨该制度合法性的不足和司法审查的有效性。检查了先前系统的三个阶段，它的开始，