Communication Reports Pub Date : 2022-08-23 , DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2022.2113549 Rudy C. Pett , Priscilla A. Lozano , Sarah Varga
Chapman’s (2015) Five Love Languages remain prevalent within popular press publications coaching individuals toward more satisfying relationships. However, the absence of empirical evidence validating the love language concept remains concerning. Using a qualitative analysis of 648 open-ended responses from 324 college-aged participants, the following study investigates the current assumptions regarding the love language concept by inductively testing the accuracy of the existing love languages typology. The results demonstrate substantial support for Chapman’s (2015) Five Love Languages, as well as evidence for a novel, sixth love language.
中文翻译:
重温爱的语言:查普曼 (2015) 五种爱的语言类型学的有效性假设的实证检验
查普曼 (2015) 的《五种爱情语言》在流行的新闻出版物中仍然很流行,指导个人建立更令人满意的关系。然而,缺乏验证爱情语言概念的经验证据仍然令人担忧。通过对来自 324 名大学生参与者的 648 份开放式回答进行定性分析,以下研究通过归纳测试现有爱情语言类型学的准确性来调查当前关于爱情语言概念的假设。结果表明对查普曼 (2015) 的五种爱情语言的大力支持,以及一种新颖的第六种爱情语言的证据。