The pandemic ‘stay at home’ obligations turned our homes from a place to live to a place to live, work, entertain ourselves and to study. Since March 2020, confinement has had a permanent impact on students’ perception of studying and on academic lifestyle. Most universities continue teaching online, and most academic facilities, such as lecture and seminar halls, student halls, and dormitories, have been abandoned. Some of them form vast areas in cities that play a major role in the urban structure. The authors have examined the degree and way of occupation of the academic infrastructure before and in time of the pandemic. Evidence and data have been gathered from different universities in Poland and Italy. From their origins, academic campuses can be considered autonomous communities within or on the city limits. In a post-pandemic perspective, the evidence shows that the growing population of students does not mean campus development and that the campuses that have shown the greatest resilience are “open” campuses which are able to share, integrate, and exchange their spaces and facilities with those of the city. The authors conclude that the pandemic will have an impact on the future urban form of academic facilities.

大流行病“待在家里”的义务使我们的家从居住的地方变成了生活、工作、娱乐和学习的地方。自 2020 年 3 月以来，禁闭对学生的学习观念和学业生活方式产生了永久性影响。大多数大学继续在线教学，大多数学术设施，如演讲厅和研讨厅、学生礼堂和宿舍，都已被废弃。其中一些在城市中形成广阔的区域，在城市结构中起着重要作用。作者检查了大流行之前和期间学术基础设施的占用程度和方式。从波兰和意大利的不同大学收集了证据和数据。从它们的起源来看，学术校园可以被认为是城市范围内或城市范围内的自治社区。在大流行后的角度来看，证据表明，学生人数的增长并不意味着校园的发展，表现出最大弹性的校园是“开放式”校园，它们能够与城市共享、整合和交换空间和设施。作者得出结论，这种流行病将对未来城市形式的学术设施产生影响。