This paper develops a theory of linearization in which the LCA (Kayne, The antisymmetry of syntax, MIT Press, 1994) linearizes one portion of the clause, with a secondary algorithm linearizing a second portion of the clause when the LCA-determined order of terminals would conflict with other principles of the morphosyntax. The empirical focus is the correspondence or lack thereof between scope and word order in Japanese, Tagalog, and English: for one portion of the clause, there is a strict correspondence between the linear order of certain elements and their scope, while for another portion of the clause, this correspondence breaks down. Given a theory of LCA-determined linear order and clause structure following Biberauer [Linguist Inq 45(2):169–225, 2014], alongside a restricted theory of reconstruction, we show that the portion of the clause for which the LCA determines linear order is that which displays the strict correspondence between linear order and scope, while that for which the secondary algorithm determines linear order is where the correspondence between scope and linear order breaks down.

本文发展了一种线性化理论，其中 LCA（Kayne，句法的反对称性，麻省理工学院出版社，1994 年）对子句的一部分进行线性化，当 LCA 确定的终端顺序时，使用辅助算法对子句的第二部分进行线性化会与形态句法的其他原则相冲突。经验重点是日语、他加禄语和英语中范围和词序之间的对应关系或不对应关系：对于从句的一部分，某些元素的线性顺序与其范围之间存在严格的对应关系，而对于另一部分条款，这种对应关系破裂。鉴于比伯劳尔 [Linguist Inq 45(2):169–225, 2014] 之后的 LCA 确定的线性顺序和子句结构理论，以及受限的重建理论，