This article sketches out two distinct attitudes towards textuality in international law, namely international hermeneutics and international poetics. It argues that these two attitudes towards textuality espouse very different types of dualism of thought. This difference bears major implications on how the international lawyer approaches international legal texts. In exposing these two attitudes towards textuality and the distinct types of dualism they reveal, this article makes a plea for a greater embrace of international poetics by international lawyers, and thus for a complete remoulding of international lawyers' dualist patterns of thought.

中文翻译：

---

国际法中对文本性的两种态度：二元论之战。

本文概述了国际法中对文本性的两种截然不同的态度，即国际诠释学和国际诗学。它认为，这两种对文本性的态度支持截然不同的二元论思想。这种差异对国际律师处理国际法律文本的方式具有重大影响。通过揭露这两种对文本性的态度以及它们所揭示的不同类型的二元论，本文呼吁国际律师更多地拥抱国际诗学，从而彻底改造国际律师的二元思维模式。