ABSTRACT

This article focuses on those “points of fracture” (Kirby and Shepherd 2020, 12) that have manifested in the implementation of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Agenda in the Mediterranean region by examining National Action Plans (NAPs) in two distinct sub-regions – the Western Balkans and North Africa. We develop a comparative framework to shed light on the dimension of participation of these plans in four countries where the debate on WPS has reached different stages: Bosnia–Herzegovina, Kosovo, Tunisia and Morocco. By empirically investigating participation as both modality and focus of WPS debate and practice in these countries, we show that NAPs are unable to produce “meaningful local ownership” (Basini and Ryan 2016, 390) and that the international discourse on WPS should be re-thought to resonate with women’s needs, experiences and perspectives in post-conflict and post-revolutionary settings.

摘要

本文重点关注地中海地区妇女、和平与安全 (WPS) 议程实施过程中出现的“断裂点” (Kirby and Shepherd 2020, 12)，通过审查两个不同的国家行动计划 (NAP)次区域——西巴尔干地区和北非。我们制定了一个比较框架，以阐明对 WPS 的辩论已达到不同阶段的四个国家这些计划的参与程度：波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、科索沃、突尼斯和摩洛哥。通过实证研究参与的方式和焦点通过对这些国家关于 WPS 的辩论和实践的分析，我们发现 NAP 无法产生“有意义的地方自主权”（Basini 和 Ryan 2016，390），并且应该重新思考关于 WPS 的国际讨论，以与妇女的需求、经验和经验产生共鸣。冲突后和革命后环境中的观点。