Scholars working on international courts and tribunals (ICTs) have recently seized the agenda of the diversity of the international judiciary and international institutions more broadly. Focusing, above all, on the lack of women in the different international benches around the world, they have criticised and proposed reforms to the composition of ICTs. This paper argues that the burgeoning literature on the diversity in ICTs expresses a particular politics of inclusion for the composition of the international judiciary. We begin by explaining the importance of looking into knowledge production in international legal scholarship as a site of (re)production of the field’s boundaries and situating the literature under study within the broader universe of the scholarship on ICTs. We then lay out this paper’s main contribution: a reconstruction and critical analysis of the normative commitments of the politics of inclusion underlying the literature on diversity in ICTs.

中文翻译：

---

问题化的多样性：国际律师（不）希望国际法院发生的变化

从事国际法院和法庭 (ICT) 工作的学者最近更广泛地抓住了国际司法机构和国际机构多样性的议程。最重要的是，他们关注世界各地不同国际席位中女性的缺乏，他们批评并提议对 ICT 的构成进行改革。本文认为，关于 ICT 多样性的新兴文献表达了国际司法机构构成的特殊包容性政治。我们首先解释了将国际法律学术研究知识生产作为领域边界（再）生产的场所的重要性，并将正在研究的文献置于更广泛的 ICT 学术领域中。然后我们列出本文的主要贡献：