The Parlement de Paris is well known to historians. However, if its role as a recorder of edicts and royal declarations is clear, less is known of the debates that informed its judgments and remonstrances. The official records compiled by court clerks have tended to be the only source used by historians. Yet some magistrates created a more personal memory of the discussions that took place within the secret council. The diary kept by Claude Guillaume II Lambert, a young councillor at the Chambre des Enquêtes, is a good example of this. It uncovers the parlementaires’ connections, power plays and strategic postures from May 1749 to June 1751, brings to life the negotiations that took place within the assembly and abounds in anecdotes. After having been a privileged source of information for the pamphleteering journalists of the eighteenth century, Lambert’s diary offers the historian a window into the very soul of the parlement.

中文翻译：

---

巴黎议会内部谈判的记述：克劳德·纪尧姆·兰伯特的日记

Parlement de Paris 为历史学家所熟知。然而，如果它作为法令和皇家声明的记录者的角色是明确的，那么它的判断和抗议的辩论就鲜为人知。法院书记员编制的官方记录往往是历史学家使用的唯一来源。然而，一些地方法官对秘密委员会内部的讨论创造了更个人化的记忆。Chambre des Enquêtes 的年轻议员 Claude Guillaume II Lambert 的日记就是一个很好的例子。它揭示了 1749 年 5 月至 1751 年 6 月期间议会议员的联系、权力博弈和战略姿态，生动地呈现了议会中发生的谈判，并提供了大量轶事。在成为 18 世纪印制小册子的记者的特权信息来源之后，