Scandinavian Journal of Management ( IF 3.383 ) Pub Date : 2023-01-11 , DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101260 Sascha Albers , Volker Rundshagen , Johanna Vanderstraeten , Markus Raueiser , Lode De Waele
Higher education institutions (HEI) are maneuvering the competing institutional logics of academia and commerce, which provide widely conflicting bases for legitimacy ascriptions. HEI that try to internalize both competing institutional logics become hybrids, addressing the resulting internal tensions and conflicts through efforts of structural separation or blending. Whereas these generic approaches have been well described, also for HEI, their underlying, constituting organizational design remains unclear. We refer to the general organization design literature to suggest templates for hybrid HEI. Dependent on the relative strength attributed to the two competing logics, respectively, we specify typical organizational designs reflecting separation as well as blending solutions. We embed these hybrid organizational design types with the pure archetypes of both logics and offer implications for research and practice in the HE field.
中文翻译:
洪堡和洛克菲勒之间:高等教育混合性的组织设计方法
高等教育机构 (HEI) 正在操纵学术界和商业界相互竞争的制度逻辑,这为合法性归因提供了广泛冲突的基础。试图将两种相互竞争的制度逻辑内化的 HEI 成为混合体,通过结构分离或混合的努力解决由此产生的内部紧张和冲突。尽管这些通用方法已得到很好的描述,但对于 HEI 而言,它们的基本构成组织设计仍不清楚。我们参考一般组织设计文献来建议混合 HEI 的模板。根据分别归因于两种竞争逻辑的相对强度,我们指定了反映分离和混合解决方案的典型组织设计。