Researchers agree on the importance of policy integration in the analysis of responses to complex problems, yet they often use this concept to indicate integrated policy programmes (IPPs) as opposed to policy integration in practice (as performed by actors). Describing how IPPs are reshaped, while they are being implemented opens new research venues in the study of the policy integration process and its effects. This article theorises the ‘(in)congruent implementation' of IPPs and illustrates its theoretical contribution with the case study of the local implementation of the national ‘Security Decree' in the Italian cities of Bologna and Pesaro. The paper makes a theoretical contribution to the study of the political aspects of policy integration. In particular, it suggests that three factors—the misalignment of state and local policy frames, the incommensurability of different subsystems’ interests, and local politicians’ risk avoidance strategies—might be led to the process of reframing national integrative intentions from the bottom up.

研究人员同意政策整合在复杂问题响应分析中的重要性，但他们经常使用这个概念来表示综合政策计划 (IPP)，而不是实践中的政策整合（由参与者执行）。描述 IPP 在实施过程中如何重塑，为政策整合过程及其影响的研究开辟了新的研究场所。本文对 IPP 的“（不）一致实施”进行了理论化，并通过在意大利博洛尼亚和佩萨罗市当地实施国家“安全法令”的案例研究说明了其理论贡献。本文对政策整合的政治方面的研究做出了理论贡献。尤其，