This paper advocates for the value of open science in many areas of research. However, after briefly reviewing the fundamental principles underlying open science practices and their use and justification, the paper identifies four incompatibilities between those principles and scientific progress through applied research. The incompatibilities concern barriers to sharing and disclosure, limitations and deficiencies of overidentifying with hypothetico-deductive methods of inference, the paradox of replication efforts resulting in less robust findings, and changes to the professional research and publication culture such that it will narrow in favor of a specific style of research. Seven recommendations are presented to maximize the value of open science while minimizing its adverse effects on the advancement of science in practice.

中文翻译：

---

开放科学，闭门造车：开放科学对实践研究的危险和潜力

本文提倡开放科学在许多研究领域的价值。然而，在简要回顾了开放科学实践的基本原则及其使用和理由之后，本文确定了这些原则与通过应用研究取得的科学进步之间的四个不相容性。不相容性涉及共享和披露的障碍、假设-演绎推理方法过度识别的局限性和缺陷、复制工作的悖论导致不那么可靠的发现，以及专业研究和出版文化的变化，使其缩小范围以支持特定的研究风格。提出了七项建议，以最大限度地发挥开放科学的价值，同时最大限度地减少其对实践科学进步的不利影响。