The drivers for the internationalization of business teaching and research were multinational corporations, the Cold War, and the relative price advantage of non-America business schools. Yet, the internationalization largely failed to reflect local contexts. The consequent paucity of original local business thought, international or not, exposes non-American business schools to the raid of American-based massive open online courses which will prune off the mainstay courses at emerging market business schools. Deprived of a substantial share of their fee-paying students, the remaining docents at those schools will be less likely to publish altogether, including in fields that might sustain independent thought. Therefore, American-like international business research is likely to have a longer life, more narrowly focused on English-speaking countries and Europe, with even less of a contribution from emerging markets.

中文翻译：

---

美国霸权在国际商业研究中的消亡被大大夸大了

商业教学和研究国际化的驱动力是跨国公司、冷战和非美国商学院的相对价格优势。然而，国际化在很大程度上未能反映当地情况。随之而来的本土原创商业思想的缺乏，无论国际与否，都使非美国商学院受到美国大规模开放在线课程的袭击，这些课程将削减新兴市场商学院的主要课程。由于被剥夺了很大一部分付费学生，这些学校剩下的讲师不太可能完全发表文章，包括在可能维持独立思考的领域。因此，类似美国的国际商业研究很可能会有更长的寿命，