We applied a computational model to examine the extent to which participants used an automated decision aid as an advisor, as compared to a more autonomous trigger of responding, at varying levels of decision aid reliability. In an air traffic control conflict detection task, we found higher accuracy when the decision aid was correct, and more errors when the decision aid was incorrect, as compared to a manual condition (no decision aid). Responses that were correct despite incorrect automated advice were slower than matched manual responses. Decision aids set at lower reliability (75%) had smaller effects on choices and response times, and were subjectively trusted less, than decision aids set at higher reliability (95%). We fitted an evidence accumulation model to choices and response times to measure how information processing was affected by decision aid inputs. Participants primarily treated low-reliability decision aids as an advisor rather than directly accumulating evidence based on its advice. Participants directly accumulated evidence based upon the advice of high-reliability decision aids, consistent with granting decision aids more autonomous influence over decisions. Individual differences in the level of direct accumulation correlated with subjective trust, suggesting a cognitive mechanism by which trust impacts human decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

自动决策辅助：他们什么时候是顾问，什么时候控制人类决策？

我们应用了一个计算模型来检查参与者在何种程度上使用自动决策辅助作为顾问，与更自主的响应触发相比，在不同级别的决策辅助可靠性。在空中交通管制冲突检测任务中，我们发现与手动条件（无决策辅助）相比，决策辅助正确时准确度更高，决策辅助错误时错误更多。尽管自动建议不正确，但正确的响应比匹配的手动响应慢。与设置为较高可靠性 (95%) 的决策辅助相比，设置为较低可靠性 (75%) 的决策辅助对选择和响应时间的影响更小，并且主观上更不信任。我们将证据积累模型应用于选择和响应时间，以衡量信息处理如何受到决策辅助输入的影响。参与者主要将低可靠性决策辅助视为顾问，而不是根据其建议直接积累证据。参与者根据高可靠性决策辅助工具的建议直接积累证据，这与授予决策辅助工具对决策的自主影响力一致。直接积累水平的个体差异与主观信任相关，表明信任影响人类决策的认知机制。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。参与者根据高可靠性决策辅助工具的建议直接积累证据，这与授予决策辅助工具对决策的自主影响力一致。直接积累水平的个体差异与主观信任相关，表明信任影响人类决策的认知机制。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。参与者根据高可靠性决策辅助工具的建议直接积累证据，这与授予决策辅助工具对决策的自主影响力一致。直接积累水平的个体差异与主观信任相关，表明信任影响人类决策的认知机制。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。