The article focuses on how Serbian/Jewish hyphenated identity, gender, and memory intersect in the writing of Paulina Lebl Albala. It explores the dynamics of these factors in three texts: Dr. David Albala as a Jewish National Worker (New York: Leo Baeck Institute, 1943), Tako je nekad bilo [That’s How it Once Was] (Belgrade: Aleksandar Lebl, 2005); and Vidov život. Biografija dr. Davida Albale [Vid’s Life: A biography of dr David Albala] (Belgrade: Čigoja štampa, 2008). The article aims to examine two different approaches (‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ discourses shaping, respectively, Jewish history and Serbian/feminist counter-history), two contrasting literary modes (biography and autobiography) and two disparate linguistic strategies (English and Serbian) used in the production of (counter)memory. The conclusion highlights that Lebl Albala employed two distinctive discourses in her writing: an official/public discourse with the male agent at its center, and an alternative/private discourse that pivots on the female subject.

这篇文章重点关注塞尔维亚/犹太人的身份、性别和记忆如何在 Paulina Lebl Albala 的写作中交叉。它在三篇文章中探讨了这些因素的动态：David Albala 博士作为犹太国家工人（纽约：Leo Baeck Institute，1943 年），Tako je nekad bilo [这就是它曾经的样子]（贝尔格莱德：Aleksandar Lebl，2005 年） ; 和维多夫日沃特。Biografija博士。戴维达阿尔巴莱[Vid 的生活：David Albala 博士的传记]（贝尔格莱德：Čigoja štampa，2008 年）。本文旨在检验两种不同的方法（分别塑造“男性”和“女性”话语，犹太历史和塞尔维亚/女权主义反历史）、两种截然不同的文学模式（传记和自传）和两种截然不同的语言策略（英语和塞尔维亚语） ) 用于生产（计数器）存储器。结论强调，Lebl Albala 在她的写作中采用了两种独特的话语：以男性代理人为中心的官方/公共话语，以及以女性主体为中心的另类/私人话语。