Within the psychoanalytic school there has been substantial and ongoing debate about the efficacy of teleanalysis. However, as a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic and the online work with which the Jungian analytic community has now had to engage, this paper initially focuses on analysts’ actual experiences of working by teleanalysis. These experiences highlight a range of issues like “Zoom fatigue”, “online disinhibition”, dissonance, confidentiality, the frame and working with new patients. Alongside these issues, there were ample experiences by analysts of both productive psychotherapy apace with analytic work involving transference and countertransference phenomena, all indicating that a genuine and good enough analytic process can occur with teleanalysis. An overview of the research and literature both prior to the pandemic and as a result of it, confirms the validity of these experiences so long as analysts are cognizant of the specifics of such an online modality. Conclusions to do with the question, “what have we learned?”, alongside training, ethics and supervision issues are subsequently discussed.

中文翻译：

---

在当代 COVID-19 大流行期间在线工作1

在精神分析学派内部，关于远程分析的功效一直存在大量且持续的争论。然而，由于当前的 COVID-19 大流行和荣格分析社区现在不得不参与的在线工作，本文最初侧重于分析师通过远程分析工作的实际经验。这些经历突出了一系列问题，例如“Zoom 疲劳”、“在线去抑制”、不和谐、保密、框架和与新患者一起工作。除了这些问题之外，分析人员在有效的心理治疗以及涉及移情和反移情现象的分析工作方面也有丰富的经验，所有这些都表明，远程分析可以产生一个真正和足够好的分析过程。对大流行之前和大流行之后的研究和文献的概述证实了这些经验的有效性，只要分析师认识到这种在线模式的细节。随后讨论了与“我们学到了什么？”这个问题有关的结论，以及培训、道德和监督问题。