We examined advice response theory’s (ART) propositions over time with mixed methods. College students (N = 122) received advice from a close other (predominantly White U.S. friends) and completed surveys preconversation, postconversation, and approximately 12 days postconversation, as well as essays 4 weeks postconversation. ART’s propositions about direct and indirect effects were partially supported: recipient preconversation evaluations of relational satisfaction indirectly predicted later implementation intentions and actual enactment via efficacy ratings. ART’s understudied moderation propositions were not supported when using ability and motivation as moderators, which we selected based on dual-processing logic. Qualitative analyses reinforced that participant views were predominantly favorable and unchanging. They also indicated that dual-processing might vary based on whether recipients remember the advice and factors such as problem and solution complexity, emotional reactions to advice, and ongoing discussions of complex problems in close relationships. We discuss implications for advice and interpersonal research.

中文翻译：

---

建议响应理论随时间的扩展

我们使用混合方法随着时间的推移检查了建议响应理论 (ART) 的命题。大学生 (N = 122) 从亲密的其他人（主要是美国白人朋友）那里得到建议，并完成了对话前、对话后和对话后大约 12 天的调查，以及对话后 4 周的论文。ART 关于直接和间接影响的命题得到了部分支持：接受者对关系满意度的对话前评估通过功效评级间接预测了后来的实施意图和实际制定。当使用我们基于双重处理逻辑选择的能力和动机作为调节器时，ART 未被充分研究的调节命题不受支持。定性分析强化了参与者的观点主要是有利的并且没有改变。他们还指出，双重处理可能会根据接受者是否记得建议以及问题和解决方案的复杂性、对建议的情绪反应以及亲密关系中对复杂问题的持续讨论等因素而有所不同。我们讨论对建议和人际关系研究的影响。