In F. Nietzsche’s philosophical thought, there is a profound link between European Nihilism and the task of modern philosophy to produce new Platos. The current article demonstrates how G. Deleuze uses the Nietzschean term Unzeitgemäβ – (Untimely – Unfashionable) in his attempt to overturn nihilistic Platonism. Deleuze enriches the Stoic paradox of [non-] when seeking an image of thought without image for the sake of what he calls the “untimely creative intensity,” an affirmative power in immanence. I argue that Deleuze reads the Stoic [non-] using the lens of the Nietzschean untimely to construct the technique of reversibility in his philosophical plane. Following the cartography of Deleuze’s philosophical route, I first examine two problems caused by Platonic nihilism: the destruction of the form in anonymity and the noiseless transmutation of copies into simulacra. Second, I discuss Deleuze’s two types of nihilism: (i) the cruciform structure of the Platonic and (ii) the use of the paradox of the [non-] upon the surface by Stoics. Finally, I comment on Deleuzian nihilism as the birthplace of creation.

中文翻译：

---

G. 德勒兹的不合时宜的[非]：柏拉图虚无主义对创造伦理的颠覆

在F.尼采的哲学思想中，欧洲虚无主义与现代哲学产生新柏拉图的任务有着深刻的联系。当前文章展示了 G. Deleuze 如何使用 Nietzschean 术语不合时宜- （不合时宜的 - 不合时宜的）他试图推翻虚无主义的柏拉图主义。德勒兹丰富了斯多葛学派的悖论[非-]寻找时没有形象的思想形象为了他所谓的“不合时宜的创造力”，一种内在的肯定力量。我认为德勒兹读的是斯多葛学派[非-]使用尼采的镜头不合时宜的构建技术可逆性在他的哲学层面。沿着德勒兹哲学路线的制图，我首先考察柏拉图虚无主义引起的两个问题：形式在匿名中的毁灭和复制品无声地转化为拟像。其次，我讨论了德勒兹的两种虚无主义：（i）柏拉图的十字形结构和（ii）悖论的使用[非-]在斯多葛学派的表面上。最后，我对作为创造发源地的德勒兹虚无主义进行评论。