Studies on international legal mobilization often analyze the mobilization efforts of activists at a single international court. Yet we know little about how activists choose among multiple international institutions to advance social justice claims. Drawing on comparative case studies of Turkish and British trade union activists' legal mobilization efforts and case law analysis, I show that activists, guided by their lawyers, probe multiple avenues to identify the legal institution with the highest judicial authority and is most responsive to activists' claims. Once they identify their target institution, the iterative process between a responsive court and activists' strategic litigation can build a court's jurisprudence in a new issue area, even if the court provides limited de jure rights protections. Activists primarily use international litigation strategy to leverage structural reforms at the domestic level and to set new international norms through precedents.

中文翻译：

---

是什么让国际机构为劳工活动家服务？通过战略诉讼塑造国际法

国际法律动员研究通常分析活动家在单一国际法院的动员努力。然而，我们对活动家如何在多个国际机构中做出选择以推进社会正义主张知之甚少。通过对土耳其和英国工会积极分子的法律动员努力和判例法分析的比较案例研究，我表明，积极分子在他们的律师的指导下，探索多种途径来确定具有最高司法权威并且对积极分子最敏感的法律机构' 索赔。一旦他们确定了他们的目标机构，即使法院提供有限的法律权利保护，回应法院和激进分子的战略诉讼之间的迭代过程也可以在新的问题领域建立法院的判例。