So far, most meta-analyses and reviews on juvenile crime risk factors focused on risk factors for traditional crimes. It is unknown, though, whether these risk factors are also relevant for the explanation of cybercrime perpetration. This meta-analytic review aimed to identify risk factors for cyberstalking, hacking, and sexting perpetrated by juveniles. A literature search yielded 48 articles (24 for cyberstalking, 15 for sexting, and 10 for hacking) that produced 903 effect sizes (306 for cyberstalking, 61 for sexting, and 536 for hacking). The results showed similarities, but also differences in risk factors for the three types of cybercrime. Overall, peer factors were found to be important for all three types (deviant peers for cyberstalking and hacking and peer pressure for sexting). Besides, for cyberstalking, previous online and offline perpetration and victimization were significant risk factors. Other small but significant effects for multiple cybercrime types were found for dark personality traits (for cyberstalking and sexting) and high computer preoccupation (for cyberstalking and hacking). Implications for (preventive) intervention are discussed, as well as the need for future research.

迄今为止，大多数关于青少年犯罪风险因素的荟萃分析和综述都集中在传统犯罪的风险因素上。但是，尚不清楚这些风险因素是否也与网络犯罪行为的解释相关。这项元分析审查旨在确定青少年实施网络跟踪、黑客攻击和发送性短信的风险因素。文献检索产生了 48 篇文章（24 篇关于网络跟踪，15 篇关于性短信，10 篇关于黑客），产生了 903 种效果大小（306 篇关于网络跟踪，61 篇关于性短信，536 篇关于黑客）。结果表明，这三种网络犯罪的风险因素有相似之处，但也存在差异。总的来说，同伴因素被发现对所有三种类型都很重要（网络跟踪和黑客行为的异常同伴和色情短信的同伴压力）。此外，对于网络跟踪，以前的在线和离线犯罪和受害是重要的风险因素。对多种网络犯罪类型的其他小而重要的影响被发现为黑暗人格特征（对于网络跟踪和色情短信）和高度计算机关注（对于网络跟踪和黑客攻击）。讨论了（预防性）干预的意义，以及未来研究的必要性。