A policy shift from soft law to hard law rests on assumptions about motivating compliance. The basic idea is that people comply with soft law for personal, moral reasons but are motivated to comply with hard law by self-interested fear. While logically this is obvious, there is also support for the view that self-determination, organisational justice and social influence are better at motivating compliance in certain contexts. Currently, there is a global policy shift moving corporate social responsibility (CSR) from a voluntary, organisation-based initiative to a practice mandated by law. This shift provides an opportunity to investigate the phenomenon of motivation in law. The current study investigates how the shift to mandatory CSR impacts motivation. Based on an analysis of the programs of 12 firms in Indonesia, we find that CSR hard law appears to motivate CSR without displacing voluntary moral initiatives.

从软法到硬法的政策转变取决于关于激励遵守的假设。基本思想是，人们出于个人、道德原因遵守软法，但出于自利的恐惧而有动机遵守硬法。虽然这在逻辑上是显而易见的，但也有人支持这样一种观点，即自决、组织公正和社会影响在某些情况下更能激发合规性。目前，全球政策正在发生转变，将企业社会责任 (CSR) 从自愿的、基于组织的倡议转变为法律强制执行的做法。这种转变为研究法律中的动机现象提供了机会。当前的研究调查了向强制性企业社会责任的转变如何影响动机。根据对印度尼西亚 12 家公司项目的分析，