OBJECTIVE Alcohol-impaired driving is a major contributor to motor vehicle crash deaths and injury. Many survey studies include self-report measures of alcohol-impaired driving, but no guidance is available to help researchers select from among available measures. The aims of this systematic review were to compile a list of measures that researchers have used previously, to compare performance between measures, and to identify the measures with highest validity and reliability. METHOD Literature searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified studies that assessed alcohol-impaired driving behavior through self-report. The measures from each study and, if available, indices of reliability or validity were extracted. Using the measures' text, we developed 10 codes to group similar measures and compare them. For example, the "alcohol effects" code refers to driving while feeling dizzy or lightheaded after drinking, and the "drink count" code pertains to the number of drinks someone consumed before driving. For measures with multiple items, each item was categorized separately. RESULTS After screening according to the eligibility criteria, 41 articles were included in the review. Thirteen articles reported on reliability. No articles reported on validity. The self-report measures with the highest reliability coefficients contained items from multiple codes, namely alcohol effects and drink count. CONCLUSIONS Self-report alcohol-impaired driving measures with multiple items evaluating distinct aspects of alcohol-impaired driving show better reliability than measures using a single item. Future work investigating the validity of these measures is needed to determine the best approach for conducting self-report research in this area.

中文翻译：

---

酒后驾驶的自我报告调查措施：系统回顾。

目标 酒后驾驶是机动车碰撞死亡和受伤的主要原因。许多调查研究都包括酒后驾驶的自我报告措施，但没有任何指导可以帮助研究人员从可用的措施中进行选择。本次系统评价的目的是编制研究人员以前使用过的衡量标准清单，比较衡量标准之间的表现，并确定具有最高有效性和可靠性的衡量标准。方法 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 的文献检索发现了通过自我报告评估酒精影响驾驶行为的研究。提取每项研究的测量值以及可靠性或有效性指数（如果有）。使用度量的文本，我们开发了 10 个代码来对相似的度量进行分组并进行比较。例如，“酒精影响”代码是指在饮酒后感到头晕或头晕的情况下驾驶，“饮酒次数”代码涉及某人在驾驶前饮用的饮料数量。对于包含多个项目的度量，每个项目都单独分类。结果按照入选标准筛选，共纳入41篇文献。十三篇文章报告了可靠性。没有文章报道有效性。具有最高可靠性系数的自我报告测量包含来自多个代码的项目，即酒精影响和饮酒次数。结论 使用多个项目评估酒后驾驶不同方面的自我报告酒后驾驶测量结果比使用单个项目的测量结果显示出更好的可靠性。未来需要调查这些措施的有效性，以确定在该领域进行自我报告研究的最佳方法。