In Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare, I argued, among other things, that preferences in economics are and ought to be total subjective comparative evaluations, that the theory of rational choice is a reformulation of everyday folk-psychological explanations and predictions of behaviour, and that revealed preference theory is completely untenable. All three of these theses have been challenged in essays by Erik Angner (2018), Francesco Guala (2019) and Johanna Thoma (2021a, 2021b). This essay responds to these criticisms and defends these three theses.

中文翻译：

---

主观总体比较评价

在《偏好、价值、选择和福利》中，我认为经济学中的偏好是而且应该是完全主观的比较评估，理性选择理论是对日常民间心理解释和行为预测的重新表述。 ，而揭示偏好理论是完全站不住脚的。所有这三篇论文都在 Erik Angner (2018)、Francesco Guala (2019) 和 Johanna Thoma (2021 a , 2021 b )的论文中受到了挑战。本文回应了这些批评并捍卫了这三个论点。