The demise of Roe v. Wade has prompted some state lawmakers to try to redefine legal personhood to begin before birth and even before pregnancy. The sweeping abortion bans passed and pending in the wake of Dobbs pose a threat to reproductive rights that extends beyond abortion. That threat spills over into in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other assisted reproductive technologies (ART). If legislatures designate embryos as legal persons, fertility clinics will be forced to change how they manage embryos, including current standard practices such as pre-implantation genetic testing, storage of unused embryos, and the disposal of those unlikely to have reproductive potential. This essay examines the many ways in which conferring the status of persons under private and public law is likely to impact patients pursuing IVF and clinics practicing ART.

中文翻译：

---

法人资格和冷冻胚胎：对后 Roe 美国生育患者和提供者的影响

Roe v. Wade 案的终结促使一些州立法者试图重新定义法人资格，使其在出生前甚至怀孕前就开始存在。在多布斯之后通过和悬而未决的全面堕胎禁令对超越堕胎的生殖权利构成了威胁。这种威胁蔓延到体外受精 (IVF) 和其他辅助生殖技术 (ART) 中。如果立法机关将胚胎指定为法人，生育诊所将被迫改变他们管理胚胎的方式，包括当前的标准做法，如植入前基因检测、未使用胚胎的储存以及不太可能具有生殖潜力的胚胎的处置。本文探讨了根据私法和公法授予人员地位可能影响进行 IVF 的患者和实践 ART 的诊所的多种方式。