This article takes a critical look at the classic couplet of theories on the justification of rights, namely, the choice theory and the interest or benefit theory, where the two are understood to be in conflict. The argument is made that this couplet is best replaced with a new one, namely, a sophisticated rendering of the benefit theory coupled with the autonomy theory, such that any conflict is resolved. The latter two theories take different cases in justifying the attribution of rights: The autonomy theory is concerned with justifying the attribution of rights to adult, rational, and competent subjects, arguing that this attribution requires a sufficiently autonomous claim by such subjects, while the benefit theory seeks to justify the attribution of rights to subjects who lack any of these three properties, meaning that they cannot be considered adult, rational, or competent.

中文翻译：

---

基于自治的权利理论

本文批判性地审视了权利正当化的经典理论组合，即选择理论和利益理论，两者被理解为是冲突的。有人认为，这副对联最好用新的对联来代替，即对利益论与自治论的复杂阐释。，从而解决任何冲突。后两种理论在证明权利归属的正当性时采用了不同的案例：自治理论涉及证明将权利归属于成人、理性和有能力的主体，认为这种归属需要这些主体充分自主的主张，而利益该理论试图证明对缺乏这三种属性中任何一种的主体的权利归属是合理的，这意味着他们不能被认为是成人的、理性的或有能力的。