In this article, the authors provide their response to the Association for Behavior Analysis International (2022) position statement on the use of contingent electric skin shock (CESS). In this response, we address concerns raised by the task force regarding limitations of the Zarcone et al. (2020) review article in which both methodological and ethical concerns were raised about the quality of research in the use of CESS with people with disabilities in the treatment of challenging behavior. We note that with the exception of the Judge Rotenberg Center in Massachusetts, no state or country currently supports the use of CESS as it is not recognized as the standard of care in any other program, school, or facility.

在本文中，作者对国际行为分析协会 (2022) 关于使用意外皮肤电击 (CESS) 的立场声明做出了回应。在此回应中，我们解决了工作组提出的有关 Zarcone 等人的局限性的担忧。(2020) 评论文章，其中对使用 CESS 治疗残疾人挑战行为的研究质量提出了方法论和伦理方面的担忧。我们注意到，除了马萨诸塞州的罗滕伯格法官中心外，目前没有任何州或国家支持使用 CESS，因为它不被认为是任何其他项目、学校或设施的护理标准。