Philosophical discussions concerning ectogestation are trending. And given that the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992), questions regarding the moral and legal status of abortion in light of the advent of ectogestation will likely continue to be of central importance in the coming years. If ectogestation can intersect with or even determine abortion policy in the future, then a new philosophical analysis of the legal status of abortion is both warranted and urgently needed. I argue that, even if there is no ‘moral’ right to fetal destruction once ectogestation becomes a reality, societies ought not to implement legal prohibitions on a pregnant person’s ability to safely obtain an abortion that results in fetal death because such laws are systemically misogynistic.

中文翻译：

---

外孕和好撒玛利亚人的争论

关于外孕的哲学讨论正在流行。鉴于美国最高法院推翻了 Roe v. Wade (1973) 和 Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992)，鉴于外孕的出现，有关堕胎的道德和法律地位的问题可能会继续存在未来几年的核心重要性。如果 ectogestation 可以与未来的堕胎政策相交甚至决定，那么对堕胎的法律地位进行新的哲学分析既是必要的，也是迫切需要的。我认为，即使在外孕成为现实后没有“道德”权利摧毁胎儿，社会也不应实施法律禁止孕妇安全获得导致胎儿死亡的堕胎的能力，因为这些法律在系统上是厌恶女性的.