The paper analyzes Senge’s (1990) philosophy of learning organization from the aspect of learning disciplines with the aim of establishing that it is impossible to apply the original concept without considering and applying the missing link – spirituality or spiritual practice. Based on the literature review, the complementarity of spiritual practice with the learning organization disciplines is demonstrated with the aim of providing guidelines for applying the original concept of the learning organization based on the synergistic efforts of individuals dedicated to learning and spirituality. This paper also answers the question of authors such as Solomon (1994) and Hammond and Wille (1994) as to whether the learning organization is just a myth, as well as Pedler and Burgoyne (2017) who question whether the learning organization is still alive. It also refutes Pava’s (2003) thesis that spiritual practice causes passivity; on the contrary, it supports the transcendental aspirations of learning individuals and learning organizations.

本文从学习学科的角度分析了 Senge (1990) 的学习型组织哲学，旨在确定如果不考虑和应用缺失的环节——灵性或精神实践，就不可能应用原始概念。在文献回顾的基础上，证明了精神实践与学习型组织学科的互补性，目的是为基于致力于学习和精神的个人的协同努力应用学习型组织的原始概念提供指导。本文还回答了 Solomon (1994) 和 Hammond and Wille (1994) 等作者关于学习型组织是否只是一个神话的问题，以及 Pedler 和 Burgoyne (2017) 质疑学习型组织是否还存在的问题. 它还驳斥了 Pava (2003) 的论点，即精神修行导致被动；相反，它支持学习型个人和学习型组织的超越愿望。