Work is closely intertwined with employees’ sleep quantity and quality, with consequences for well-being and productivity. Yet despite the conceptualization of sleep health as a multidimensional pattern of various sleep characteristics, little is known about workers’ experiences of the diverse range of sleep health dimensions (e.g., sleep regularity, daytime alertness, and sleep efficiency in addition to quantity and quality) proposed by contemporary frameworks. The present study integrates modern sleep frameworks with the Job Demands-Control-Support Model to describe common multidimensional sleep health phenotypes among employees and their associations with job characteristics. Across two national samples (N₁ = 2353; N₂ = 1260) of working adults from the Midlife in the United States study, latent class analysis indicated three common sleep health phenotypes: (1) good sleepers who exhibit good sleep across all dimensions, (2) catch-up sleepers who sleep longer on non-workdays and shorter on workdays but exhibit otherwise good sleep, and (3) short, dissatisfied, inefficient, and irregular sleepers (SDIIs) who were suboptimal across four of the five measured sleep health dimensions. Good sleepers reported low job demands, high control, and high support (similar to a low-strain job). Catch-up sleepers reported high job control and moderate demands and support (similar to an active job). SDIIs reported high demands, low control, and low support (similar to a high-strain job). We discuss implications for job characteristics theories, sleep health frameworks, and practical management of employee sleep when measured as a multidimensional pattern of sleep health experiences.

工作与员工的睡眠数量和质量密切相关，对幸福感和生产力产生影响。然而，尽管睡眠健康被概念化为各种睡眠特征的多维模式，但人们对工人在各种睡眠健康维度（例如，除了数量和质量之外，睡眠规律、白天警觉性和睡眠效率）的体验知之甚少由当代框架提出。本研究将现代睡眠框架与工作需求-控制-支持模型相结合，以描述员工常见的多维睡眠健康表型及其与工作特征的关联。在两个国家样本中（N ₁  = 2353；N ₂ = 1260) 来自美国中年研究的工作成年人，潜在类别分析表明三种常见的睡眠健康表型：(1)在各个方面都表现出良好睡眠的好睡眠者，(2)睡眠时间更长的补觉者- 工作日和工作日更短，但表现出良好的睡眠，以及 (3) 睡眠时间短、不满意、效率低下和不规律的睡眠者(SDIIs) 在五个测量的睡眠健康维度中的四个方面表现不佳。睡得好的人报告工作要求低、控制力强和支持度高（类似于低压力工作）。追赶睡眠者报告说，他们对工作的控制度很高，要求和支持适中（类似于积极的工作）。SDIIs 报告了高要求、低控制和低支持（类似于高压力工作）。当作为睡眠健康体验的多维模式进行测量时，我们讨论了对工作特征理论、睡眠健康框架和员工睡眠实际管理的影响。