782The article analyzes the impact of the Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on the dialogue policies in listed companies. Starting from the new obligations of sustainability‐related disclosure in the financial services sector, the essay envisages governance solutions which are able to grant interim information flows between the board of directors and the institutional investors about sustainability performances, also in light of the recent Directive (EU) 2022/2464. The essay deals more specifically with the following topics: a) the division of power between directors and supervisory board, and then the directors who are entitled to intervene in the hypothesized ESG-dialogues; b) the modality of the dialogue, if one-way or two-way, and the impact that such ESG-dialogues have on the company’s governance, especially on the relationship between the directors and the supervisory board; c) the possibility of selecting shareholders who are entitled to attend the meeting; d) the relation between the board of directors and the general meeting of shareholders; e) the possibility of involving investors who are not shareholders, particularly a bidder, in ESG-dialogues with institutional investors.783

中文翻译：

---

金融服务中与可持续发展相关的披露和上市公司的对话政策

第782章文章分析了（EU）2019/2088法规对上市公司对话政策的影响。本文从金融服务部门与可持续发展相关的披露的新义务出发，设想了治理解决方案，该解决方案能够在董事会和机构投资者之间提供有关可持续发展绩效的临时信息流，同时也考虑到最近的指令（欧盟）2022/2464。本文更具体地讨论了以下主题：A）董事和监事会之间的权力划分，以及有权干预假设的 ESG 对话的董事；b)对话的方式（单向还是双向），以及此类 ESG 对话对公司治理的影响，特别是对董事与监事会之间关系的影响；C）选择有权出席会议的股东的可能性；d)董事会与股东大会的关系；e)让非股东投资者（特别是投标人）参与与机构投资者的 ESG 对话的可能性。第783章