∞ For the approximately one million Rohingya forced to flee Myanmar since October 2016, unfolding proceedings in both the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) present potential avenues for securing justice. Yet, for male and gender-diverse victims of sexual violence, whose experiences have historically been overlooked in international criminal law, justice requires recognition of all the crimes committed against them. This article demonstrates that the burgeoning narrative of events constructed in and by both the ICJ and the ICC is one which sidelines the experiences of male and gender-diverse victims of sexual violence. By comparing publicly available filings and decisions of the ICJ and the ICC with reports produced by UN bodies and nongovernmental organizations, and drawing upon insights gained from interviews with lawyers working with the Rohingya, I expose the gaps in the emerging narrative of Rohingya victimization and explain the reasons behind them.

中文翻译：

---

罗辛亚种族灭绝中性暴力的男性和性别多元化受害者：国际法院的选择性叙述

对于自 2016 年 10 月以来被迫逃离缅甸的约 100 万罗辛亚人来说，国际法院 (ICJ) 和国际刑事法院 (ICC) 正在进行的诉讼程序提供了寻求正义的潜在途径。然而，对于性暴力的男性和不同性别受害者来说，他们的经历历来在国际刑法中被忽视，正义需要承认针对他们犯下的所有罪行。本文表明，国际法院和国际刑事法院对事件的新兴叙述忽视了男性和不同性别的性暴力受害者的经历。通过将国际法院和国际刑事法院公开提交的文件和裁决与联合国机构和非政府组织编写的报告进行比较，