当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.
Psychological Assessment ( IF 6.083 ) Pub Date : 2023-06-29 , DOI: 10.1037/pas0001255
Colin D Freilich 1 , Isabella M Palumbo 2 , Robert D Latzman 3 , Robert F Krueger 1
Affiliation  

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is the primary tool for assessing maladaptive personality traits within the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Evidence has begun to accumulate on the replicability and measurement invariance of its five-domain factor structure across countries, clinical and community populations, and sex, but its equivalency across racial groups within a given country is largely unstudied. Attempting to replicate the evidence of noninvariance demonstrated by Bagby et al. (2022), we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 across White Americans (n = 612) and Black Americans (n = 613) within the United States. The five-domain structure emerged across both samples with reasonably congruent factor loadings. Therefore, we tested for measurement invariance using the 13-step framework advocated by Marsh et al. (2009) for personality data. We found support for the PID-5's comparability across racial groups, offering some preliminary backing for its use with Black Americans, though additional evidence is needed to clarify the conflicting results and further validate the instrument. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

评估 DSM-5 人格量表在美国黑人和白人中的测量不变性。

DSM-5 人格量表 (PID-5) 是评估 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型中适应不良人格特征的主要工具。关于其五域因子结构在不同国家、临床和社区人口以及性别之间的可复制性和测量不变性的证据已经开始积累,但其在特定国家内不同种族群体之间的等效性基本上尚未被研究。试图复制 Bagby 等人证明的非不变性证据。(2022),我们研究了美国境内美国白人 (n = 612) 和美国黑人 (n = 613) 的 PID-5 因子结构。两个样本都出现了五域结构,并且因子负载相当一致。因此,我们使用 Marsh 等人提倡的 13 步框架来测试测量不变性。(2009) 用于个性数据。我们找到了对 PID-5 跨种族群体可比性的支持,为其在美国黑人中的使用提供了一些初步支持,尽管需要更多证据来澄清相互矛盾的结果并进一步验证该工具。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2023-06-29
down
wechat
bug