Journal of Dual Diagnosis ( IF 2.324 ) Pub Date : 2023-06-30 , DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2023.2226024 Ryan Petros 1 , Denise D Walker 1 , Adam Pierce 2 , Maria Monroe-DeVita 3
Abstract
Objective: No evidence-based intervention effectively reduces cannabis use in young adults with psychosis (YAP). To generate hypotheses about why, a scoping review was conducted to synthesize evidence about motivations for cannabis use and reduction/cessation for YAP and the psychosocial interventions trialed to identify possible gaps between motivations and interventive strategies. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in December, 2022. Reviews of titles and abstracts (N = 3,216) and full-texts (n = 136) resulted in 46 articles. Results: YAP use cannabis for pleasure, to reduce dysphoria, and for social and recreational reasons; motivations for cessation include insight about cannabis-psychosis interactions, incompatibility with goals and social roles, and support from social networks. Interventions with at least minimal evidence of efficacy include motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioral strategies, and family skills training. Conclusions: Authors recommend additional research on mechanisms of change and motivational enhancement therapy, behavioral activation, and family-based skills interventions matched to YAP motivations for use/cessation.
中文翻译:
减少大麻心理社会干预措施的范围审查以及在患有精神病的年轻人中使用的原因
摘要
目的:没有基于证据的干预措施能有效减少患有精神病(YAP)的年轻人使用大麻。为了产生关于原因的假设,进行了范围界定审查,以综合有关大麻使用动机和减少/停止 YAP 的证据,以及尝试的社会心理干预措施,以确定动机和干预策略之间可能存在的差距。方法:于 2022 年 12 月进行了系统文献检索。对标题和摘要 ( N = 3,216) 以及全文 ( n = 136) 的评论得出了 46 篇文章。结果:YAP 使用大麻是为了愉悦、减少烦躁感以及社交和娱乐原因;戒烟的动机包括对大麻与精神病相互作用的了解、与目标和社会角色的不相容以及来自社交网络的支持。至少具有最低限度有效性证据的干预措施包括动机访谈、认知行为策略和家庭技能培训。结论:作者建议对改变机制和动机增强疗法、行为激活以及与 YAP 使用/停止动机相匹配的基于家庭的技能干预进行更多研究。