This study offers a comprehensive overview of the literature on policy advisory systems (PAS), motivated by its significance, growing interest in the field among policy scholars, and the substantial body of recent research published recently. The study conducted a quantitative bibliometric analysis of 62 articles on PAS published between 1993 and 2022, using data extracted from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis included performance analysis, collaboration analysis, and science mapping (co-citation and co-word analysis). The dataset comprises articles published in 29 different journals, with 17.2% of these journals publishing three or more articles on PAS. Of the 80 authors in the dataset, 78.8% had only one publication. Over the past 5 years, there has been a 69% increase in the production of research on PAS, with the majority of output coming from Canada, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands. The intellectual structure of the field was examined through co-citation analysis, revealing two main clusters named dynamics of PAS and Policy Advice & Policy Analysts' Role. The former focuses on the variations and dynamics of PAS, while the latter is more concerned with the nature of policy advice and the role of policy analysts. The co-word analysis identified the most relevant issues linked with PAS, including policy advice, externalization, politicization, and policy capacity. The study has also provided operationalization of the concept with the support of empirical evidence and categorized it into internal and external PAS. Externalization is the dominant trend in Anglophone countries, while public service in Europe and Canada has been the focus of internal PAS research. The study identifies gaps in the literature and calls for further research on the application of PAS in the Global South, the demand for policy advice, and comparative analysis of PAS across different contexts and dimensions.

中文翻译：

---

政策咨询系统和公共政策制定：文献计量分析、知识图谱、操作化和未来研究议程

本研究对政策咨询系统 (PAS) 的文献进行了全面的概述，其动机是其重要性、政策学者对该领域日益增长的兴趣以及最近发表的大量研究成果。该研究使用从 Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中提取的数据，对 1993 年至 2022 年间发表的 62 篇 PAS 文章进行了定量文献计量分析。分析包括绩效分析、协作分析和科学图谱（共引和共词分析）。该数据集包含 29 种不同期刊上发表的文章，其中 17.2% 的期刊在 PAS 上发表了三篇或更多文章。数据集中的 80 位作者中，78.8% 的作者仅发表过一篇论文。过去 5 年，PAS 的研究成果增加了 69%，大部分产出来自加拿大、澳大利亚、德国和荷兰。通过共被引分析对该领域的知识结构进行了检查，揭示了两个主要集群，即 PAS 动态和政策建议与政策分析师角色。前者关注PAS的变化和动态，而后者更关注政策建议的性质和政策分析师的作用。共词分析确定了与伊斯兰党最相关的问题，包括政策建议、外部化、政治化和政策能力。该研究还在经验证据的支持下提供了这一概念的可操作性，并将其分为内部和外部 PAS。外部化是英语国家的主导趋势，而欧洲和加拿大的公共服务一直是PAS内部研究的重点。该研究指出了文献中的空白，并呼吁进一步研究 PAS 在全球南方的应用、政策建议的需求以及不同背景和维度的 PAS 比较分析。