PURPOSE This study investigated the validity of introducing a clinical skills examination (CSE) to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination through a mixed-method modified Delphi study METHODS A 3-round Delphi study was conducted between September and November 2022. The expert panel comprised 21 oriental medicine education experts who were officially recommended by relevant institutions and organizations. The questionnaires included potential content for the CSE and a detailed implementation strategy. Subcommittees were formed to discuss concerns around the introduction of the CSE, which were collected as open-ended questions. In this study, a 66.7% or greater agreement rate was defined as achieving a consensus. RESULTS The expert panel’s evaluation of the proposed clinical presentations and basic clinical skills suggested their priorities. Of the 10 items investigated for building a detailed implementation strategy for the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination, a consensus was achieved on 9. However, the agreement rate on the timing of the introduction of the CSE was low. Concerns around 4 clinical topics were discussed in the subcommittees, and potential solutions were proposed. CONCLUSION This study offers preliminary data and raises some concerns that can be used as a reference while discussing the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination.

中文翻译：

---

韩国韩医学执照考试引入临床技能考试的实施策略：混合方法改良德尔菲研究

目的 本研究调查通过混合方法改良德尔菲研究将临床技能考试 (CSE) 引入韩国东方医学执照考试的有效性 方法 2022 年 9 月至 11 月期间进行了 3 轮德尔菲研究。专家小组由 21 名成员组成由相关机构和组织正式推荐的韩医学教育专家。调查问卷包括全面性教育的潜在内容和详细的实施策略。成立了小组委员会来讨论有关引入全面性教育的担忧，这些问题被收集为开放式问题。在本研究中，66.7%或更高的同意率被定义为达成共识。结果 专家小组对拟议的临床表现和基本临床技能的评估表明了他们的优先事项。在为制定韩方医师资格考试引入CSE的详细实施策略而进行的10项调查中，有9项达成了共识。但是，对于引入CSE的时机的一致率较低。小组委员会讨论了围绕 4 个临床主题的担忧，并提出了潜在的解决方案。结论 本研究提供了初步数据并提出了一些问题，在讨论将 CSE 引入韩国东方医学执照考试时可作为参考。