ABSTRACT

This article considers the contested case of the Minhocão, São Paulo, to be either removed or turned into a park. The case provides insights for framing and planning literature. It is analysed through interviews, and media and document analysis. The results show that the involved actors adopt different framing strategies: adaptive, coherent, or deliberative. Each strategy has particular intended and actual audiences that help explain the dynamics of participatory contestation. Each strategy reveals choices in dealing with adversaries, who are present, and with intended audiences, who are largely absent. And each strategy has specific repercussions for learning and planning outcomes.

摘要

本文认为，有争议的圣保罗米霍考公园要么被拆除，要么变成公园。该案例为框架和规划文献提供了见解。通过访谈、媒体和文件分析对其进行分析。结果表明，所涉及的参与者采用不同的框架策略：适应性、连贯性或深思熟虑。每个策略都有特定的预期和实际受众，有助于解释参与性竞争的动态。每一种策略都揭示了与在场的对手以及基本上缺席的目标受众打交道的选择。每个策略对学习和规划结果都有特定的影响。