The Covid pandemic has forced analysts around the world, some more than others, to work using Zoom and Skype. The technical innovation is here to stay and raises questions on a theoretical level. Is online analysis ‘real’ analysis or not? What is lost from the analytical experience? What, if anything, is gained? The global health emergency, on the one hand, has made these questions inescapable; on the other, it has provided a kind of huge experimental field to deal with them. Here, the author argues that when viewed from the perspective of the concepts of intercorporeity (Merleau-Ponty), un-distancing (Heidegger), and aura (Benjamin), some of the issues of ‘presence’ in teleanalysis become clearer.

新冠病毒大流行迫使世界各地的分析师（其中一些人更多）使用 Zoom 和 Skype 进行工作。技术创新将继续存在，并在理论层面提出问题。在线分析是否是“真正的”分析？分析经验丢失了什么？如果有的话，会得到什么？一方面，全球卫生紧急情况使这些问题不可避免；另一方面，另一方面，它为应对它们提供了一种巨大的实验场。在此，作者认为，当从互体性（梅洛-庞蒂）、非距离性（海德格尔）和光环（本杰明）等概念的角度来看时，远程分析中的一些“在场”问题变得更加清晰。