Summary

The acquisition of property by traditio, In addition, putative iusta causa traditionis and consequences for the doctrine of condictio. – The Justinian Digest contain a number of texts in which the traditio transfers ownership, although the ‘causa’ on account of which the delivery takes place, does not exist in fact. The paper attempts to show that this phenomenon cannot be explained through a broad acceptance of the putative causa traditionis, because the Roman concept of the traditio ex iusta causa differed from that of the ‘titulus-modus-doctrine’. The classical Roman law considered the iusta causa in most cases as the purpose of the delivery, for which the traditio was a means to achieve; the (non-)achievement of the intended purpose did not decide on the transfer of ownership, but only whether the recovery of the performance (condictio) was admissible. This shows the way Roman law favored the transfer of ownership.

中文翻译：

---

通过传统获得财产：同时论推定的传统原因问题和条件理论的后果

概括

通过传统获得财产，此外，推定的iusta causa 传统和对条件原则的后果。– 《查士丁尼文摘》包含许多文本，其中传统转移了所有权，尽管交付发生的“原因”实际上并不存在。本文试图表明这种现象不能通过广泛接受假定的因果传统来解释，因为罗马的传统概念与“ titulus - modus -doctrine”的概念不同。古典罗马法认为iusta causa在大多数情况下，作为分娩的目的，传统是实现这一目的的手段；预期目的的（未）实现并不决定所有权的转移，而仅决定是否收回履行（条件）。这表明罗马法有利于所有权转让。