We describe our decision points to disclose parts of our personal selves while building trust with vulnerable populations in schools during ethnographic studies. Finding how our subjective identities were similar to and different than those of our participants helped us to better understand the participants' lives. We argue in this article that the introspection created by negotiating subjectivities in our contrasting examples of intersectionality taught us more about structural inequality in schools than we learned via ethnographic data collection methods alone.

中文翻译：

---

把握研究者/参与者关系中主观性和信任的关系

我们描述了在人种学研究期间与学校弱势群体建立信任的同时披露部分个人自我的决策点。找出我们的主观身份与参与者的相似和不同之处有助于我们更好地了解参与者的生活。我们在本文中认为，在交叉性的对比例子中，通过协商主观性而产生的内省，比我们仅通过民族志数据收集方法了解到的更多关于学校结构性不平等的知识。