ABSTRACT

Three arguments support the involvement of actors in the design and implementation of the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). First, it strengthens the evaluation; second, it allows taking advantage of the performative function; third, it is aligned with the concept of RRI. In Europe, the trend to institutionalize RRI triggered an interest in developing specific M&E methods and tools, but how actors participate in these processes is still being determined. This paper investigates the extent to which the participation of actors occurs or is expected to occur by using the three stages of translation proposed by Callon and colleagues – problematization, development of the research, and transfer to a real setting. Through a systematic review of 25 approaches developing M&E mechanisms, our findings show that participation occurs or is foreseen mainly in the later stages and is specially linked with learning and trust-related purposes.

摘要

三个论点支持参与者参与负责任研究和创新 (RRI) 监测和评估 (M&E) 的设计和实施。一是强化考核；其次，它允许利用表演功能；第三，与RRI理念相契合。在欧洲，RRI 制度化的趋势引发了人们对开发特定监测与评估方法和工具的兴趣，但参与者如何参与这些过程仍待确定。本文通过使用 Callon 及其同事提出的翻译的三个阶段——问题化、研究的发展和转移到真实环境，来调查演员的参与发生或预期发生的程度。通过对 25 种制定 M&E 机制的方法进行系统审查，