The recent reframing of global biodiversity policy from (unsuccessfully) dealing with ‘underlying causes’ to focusing on spatial allocations and planning implies renewed urgency of reconciling goal-oriented spatial planning of rights to use land and water with harmony-oriented ‘co-production’ by the relevant stakeholders. Current understanding of spatial and temporal variation in the balance between goal-oriented instrumental and harmony-oriented relational values of nature recognizes different decision-making styles. Taking Indonesia and Vietnam as examples, we explored how current tools and processes of land-use planning for multiple environmental services (LUMENS) deal with that balance, and what further steps may be needed to meet current expectations, across all sustainable development goals in a mega-diverse country with an export-oriented economy and its changing norms. So far, relational values are expressed primarily as stakeholder preferences through the ‘co-production’ process, consultations, and priority setting, while instrumental values and economic multipliers are formally presented.

最近，全球生物多样性政策从（不成功地）处理“根本原因”转向关注空间分配和规划，这意味着调和以目标为导向的土地和水使用权空间规划与以和谐为导向的“共同生产”变得更加迫切。由相关利益相关者。当前对自然目标导向的工具性与和谐导向的关系价值之间平衡的时空变化的理解认识到不同的决策风格。以印度尼西亚和越南为例，我们探讨了多种环境服务土地利用规划（LUMENS）的当前工具和流程如何处理这种平衡，以及可能需要采取哪些进一步措施来满足当前的期望，在一个具有出口导向型经济及其不断变化的规范的超级多元化国家中，实现所有可持续发展目标。到目前为止，关系价值主要通过“共同生产”过程、协商和优先级设定以利益相关者偏好的形式表达，而工具价值和经济乘数则被正式呈现。