Focusing on the behavior and outcomes, Prisoner’s dilemma research rarely encompasses the examination of the effects of (un)awareness. To bridge the research gap, the aim is to outline the deviations that stem from the (un)awareness and to assess its impact on the in-game reasoning, outcome, and modeling. More precisely, through a thought experiment, the overview conceptually encompasses the effects of (un)awareness of game elements (actions, players, and payoffs), differing between awareness in a narrow and broad sense. The deviations due to (un)awareness of game elements show how the game can deviate from the proposed model, whereby unawareness and skewed awareness of the players bear the most prominent differences. Compiling the most notable deviations provokes second thoughts on game theory modeling. The findings on each deviation are shortly discussed and extended to two practical examples to illustrate possible implications.

囚徒困境研究侧重于行为和结果，很少包括对（不）意识的影响的检验。为了弥合研究差距，目的是概述由于（不）意识而产生的偏差，并评估其对游戏推理、结果和建模的影响。更准确地说，通过思想实验，概述在概念上涵盖了游戏元素（动作、玩家和收益）的（不）意识的影响，狭义和广义的意识是不同的。由于对游戏元素的（不）意识而导致的偏差表明游戏如何偏离所提出的模型，其中玩家的不意识和扭曲的意识具有最显着的差异。整理最显着的偏差引发了人们对博弈论建模的重新思考。